User talk:Gak

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Tuberculosis - pages on DOTS/RNTCP

I had recently started a Wikipage on RNTCP, and only later did i realise that you have previously contributed a lot towards Tuberculosis , and that you had discussed about the need for including/integrating DOTS on the wikipage Tuberculosis treatment. Now it looks odd to have a separate page for RNTCP without one for DOTS. What shall i do ? Seethahere 10:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

It's "sTIBogluconate", not sTILBogluconate.

No harm done, this is just so you know. DS 15:37, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protocol

Also, it's not generally considered polite to remove messages from your talk page unless they're grossly insulting. You can archive if/when it gets too big, yes, but just deleting... not really done. DS 03:35, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protocol

Okay, firstly, you should leave messages on other users' talk pages, not on the userpages themselves. This is because, when you leave the message on the talk page, this triggers the "you have new messages" announcement.

As for why you shouldn't remove messages - there are various reasons for that. It can be construed as looking like you're trying to hide something... it's not good to delete warnings... there was an ArbCom ruling that it's not good to tamper with other people's opinions and statements... anyway, it's not like we're strapped for memory here. If the page gets too full, you can archive it. DS 22:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is too unreasonable to archive messages you have read by deleting them - they are still available in the page history. Is there a policy guideline that they should be archived, and not deleted? Thue | talk 09:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Body louse

Good work on Body louse! :)

Couldn't you also just put the clothes with cannot be boiled in sealed plastic bags, and then wait until all the lice have hatched and starved to death? Thue | talk 09:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not practical because the eggs don't hatch until they come into contact with warmth. I have no idea how long eggs can survive in that sort of "suspended animation" sort of state.--Gak 20:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey doc!

Hello, for some reason I hadn't noticed your extensive contributions to infectious disease subjects. Good thing too, because it was one of the fields Wikipedia needed help in. Where do you work? Have you considered joining our doctors' mess at Wikipedia:WikiProject Clinical medicine? JFW | T@lk 16:47, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tuberculosis

Hi, Gak. JFW mentioned that you may be able to help rescue the featured status of tuberculosis. Some of the problems are listed here. It needs to be brought to standard, more along the lines of cystic fibrosis or AIDS, which are recent medical featured articles. If you're able to help, please drop a note on the Featured Article Review page. Thanks! Sandy 21:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Influenza

Page now nominated as a FAC. Comments and suggestions are welcome on the review page. Thank you. TimVickers 00:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Thanks for recent formating and additions to Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. I added some addition PubMed abstract and article links to the citations you had kindly provided.

The article in the 'Annual review' section indicates that referral to haematologist only occurs when serum electrophoresis shows an increasing paraprotein level, and only then does the haematologist arrange a skeletal survery. Your addition of a diagnosis criteria section implies that referral to a haematologist and the skeletal survery are performed prior to making the diagnosis, rather than at a later date. This seems to me, as a nonspecialist, contradictory - either skeletal surveying is generally infrequently initially performed (vs the list of all possible tests that a textbook might list, but which a specialist may commonly choose not to perform), or the info in the 'Annual review' section needs to be relocated within the article. I would be grateful if you could help clarify this point; please see Talk:Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance#Diagnosis, Haematology referral and skeletal surveying :-) David Ruben ^Talk 02:21, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Antimalarials/antiprotozoals

Just a quick thank you for your recent additions to primaquine, as well as your creations of artesunate, pamaquine and nifurtimox. Keep up the good work. Best, Fvasconcellos 15:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fractional values?

At talk:degrees of freedom (statistics), you wrote:

Who's written that fractional degrees of freedom are possible?? Why add confusion to an already confused article? --Gak 20:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who added that, but since your comment I've added a bit on what non-integer degrees of freedom are used for in statistics. Michael Hardy 18:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phase 1

I saw your addition on VX 950. I wasn't aware this was only in Phase 1. Is it generally your view we should have articles on compounds that are still undergoing testing? We certainly don't have a policy yet, and we have many similar articles. I must admit I have written about dabigatran and rivaroxaban, despite them being experimental compounds, but the ximelagatran experience has shown that even post-phase III agents can still bork quite badly. JFW | T@lk 12:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No idea! VX 950 is now into phase 2 testing but who knows? I am not aware or policy either, but drugs are so often resurrected in different guises. Like Adefovir for HIV was later resurrected for HBV. And I guess I also have patients in clinical trials so it is nice to know what the long term consequences are, e.g., I have a few patients who were in clinical trials for loviride as monotherapy and ended up with K103N mutations and the consequences of that. --Gak 14:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Immunoperoxidase staining

Hi there, I noticed that you left some sort of template asking for more context to be put on the immunoperoxidase staining page. It would be helpful if you put some more specific comments on the talk page. Dr Aaron 14:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Gak 00:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Khao Phra Viharn

Hello, Gak. I've been fleshing out the Preah Vihear/Phra Viharn article. Wondering if your trip there was recent and whether you entered from the Thai side. My wife and I are thinking of visiting later this year and want to know whether the Cambodians require a visa. I've heard that they don't, but you never know... Writer128 (talk) 20:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Khao Phra Viharn 2

Thanks for your response and kind words of advice. Actually, I can manage in Thai myself, having lived in Thailand for six years in the 60s and 70s. Visited Preah Vihear in 1973 or 74 and somewhere have photos from that visit. Are you a Thai speaker as well? I notice you added the Thai name to the article.Writer128 (talk) 03:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the advice. I'm looking forward to the trip. Writer128 (talk) 01:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surrogate endpoint

Hi, I merged Surrogate markers into surrogate endpoint, as you suggested back in the day. Please review the post-merge cleanup I did to the article, since you are an authority on this topic. EAE (Holla!) 03:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey request

Hi,
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

Thank You, Sam4bc (talk) 15:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mosquitoes

Thanks for your work on these. As the main contributor to the Plasmodium page and links there from - mosquitoes show up from time to time. While I know a bit about these I have been reluctant to do much with them as it is an area of considerable complexity. Im impressed any one is prepared to do this. DrMicro

Differential diagnosis

In the article Rabies, is the addition of "differential diagnosis" necessary to the title? I am new to this field, and would like your opinion on that. One the key campaigns in Rabies was in simplifying the titles so that readers new to the field would not be overwhelmed (we had all short of unusual names, such as "The spatial and temporal distribution of opossum rabies", you can see the older version here [1]). ChyranandChloe (talk) 03:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK

Thanks, I'll see what I can do, but why does it say that it needs references if I can see plenty of references? Buɡboy52.4 (talk) 14:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I looked through the page and it seems that is a genus of mites, which meens that it is suppose to have a group of mites. But I do think that it should be revised to "encyclopedia standard!" And I also found(though I am not sure that plaidgerism is in WP:Policy) plaigerism to the web page, http://zipcodezoo.com/Key/Animalia/Trombiculidae_Family.asp, or it may be possible that the web page used wikipedia... Buɡboy52.4 (talk) 00:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello agian. I just wanted your opinion before I continued editing, so I added info, rearranged the titles, and added a taxonomy in my sandbox, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bugboy52.40/sandbox2. Tell me what you think. Buɡboy52.4 (talk) 03:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you can get me some links to prove that only Leptotrombidium transmit scrub typhus, I'll make a whole new article on the genus, and move the the incorrect info to the new article. Buɡboy52.4 (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you great amount of patience, but I finally got a chance to create trombiculidae, if you need anything else, just ask! Buɡboy52.4 (talk) 03:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steward elections

Thanks for your vote, for or against, and your constructive comments. Apteva (talk) 14:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rufskin

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rufskin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No context

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Babakathy (talk) 13:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Leptotrombidium

Hello! Your article Leptotrombidium was recently nominated at Did you know to be featured on the main page. The nomination has now been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 18:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, there is a little bit that needs to be clarified in the article before it can be promoted to the main page; the second paragraph (about how the mites transmit the disease to humans) is a bit unclear, and I have not been able to understand if it's saying they are not vectors, or what (or, indeed, what the difference is between a vector and a carrier). If you could rewrite that paragraph to make it a bit clearer, especially for lay readers, that would be very helpful. There is more discussion at Template talk:Did you know#Leptotrombidium. Thanks, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 03:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gak, sorry to bother you again, but I just wanted to see if you're planning on clarifying the bit of confusing text in the Leptotrombidium article, which people are still discussing at DYK (the link I gave in my previous message). The concern is just that I'm a little confused about what the mites are classified as (vectors, reservoirs, carriers, etc?) and how they pass the disease to humans. If you could clarify that bit of the text, it would help avoid a lot of arguing :) Thanks, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 02:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References added and clean-up template removed.--Gak (talk) 01:03, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Leptotrombidium

On March 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leptotrombidium, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 20:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Neisseriaceae; Ergosterol; Pseudomonadaceae; Post-exposure prophylaxis; Hepatitis D; Gangrene; Burkholderia; Streptococcus suis; Sotalol; Hepatitis G; Chronic liver disease; Leukopenia; Myelitis; World Tuberculosis Day; Micrograph; Burkholderia mallei; Neisseria; Monocytosis; Chloroflexi

Cleanup: Autoantibody; Course (medicine); Fluorescein
Merge: Renal function; Epidemic; Acne vulgaris
Add Sources: Physical examination; Endemic (epidemiology); Aminoglycoside
Wikify: American Bureau of Shipping; Bioterrorism; Holkar
Expand: Fetus; Toxic epidermal necrolysis; Antinuclear antibodies

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Email address

Hello GAK! I have read your article about Chinese bronzes. Is it also possible to contact you via Email? Greetings from Germany --Reiner Stoppok (talk) 12:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CPR

Hi there,

I saw your edit to Cardiopulmonary resuscitation earlier, and i have for the time being reverted it, and started a discussion on the article talk page on the reasons, but in a nutshell, i've looked at your source article, and I think the information you wrote is not fully supported by the source, and i think it may be in the wrong place in the article, but I do think some further information about end of life care for terminal patients in relation to CPR would be valuable. Hope you can contribute again (and my apologies for the reversion). Regards, OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 18:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chloramphenicol

Hi Gak. When I was five years old, I was given chloramphenicol to preemptively fight a brain infection for a bad head injury. Approximately five months after the treatment, I had a large number of bruises all over my body, and my platelet count was down to about 40,000. My parents were told that I had developed aplastic anemia because of the Chloramphenicol, and would likely die. Within a month, my platelet count had doubled; it was assumed that I was one of the rare few to make a spontaneous recovery. My blood counts were found to be normal before long.

I'm in my thirties now, and have had a very hard time getting medical insurance because of this episode. The insurance companies consider me to be a 'major risk' because of the aplastic anemia diagnosis, despite the fact that I have had normal blood counts for the last 30 years. My own research seems to indicate that some people develop bone marrow suppression after a cumulative dose threshold is exceeded, and that this suppression can occur months after therapy discontinues.

I'm writing to you since you are the author of the major rewrite for the chloramphenicol article, which is largely still intact. Do you know of any good journal articles that I can send to my insurance underwriters to possibly debunk the theory that I am high risk?

I understand that the incidence of aplastic anemia in response to chloramphenicol is approximately 1 in 30,000 people, and that a full recovery from such a state is quite rare. Am I truly this rare patient, or was my reaction more easily explained? Any and all information you can supply to me is incredibly valuable, since I am currently uninsured. Thanks very much in advance for any help you can give me. Sincerely, Linda.130.13.166.168 (talk) 13:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your response. Yes, you are correct that I made a full recovery without a bone marrow transplant. The university near my home has a copy of the book you mentioned --- I plan to copy the relevant sections and see if I can track down the pediatric hematologist that originally diagnosed me; perhaps he can "reverse" the diagnosis and make me "insurable" once more. Thanks again for your help. Sincerely, Linda.130.13.166.168 (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-block

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1518880 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Closedmouth (talk) 14:12, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Gak! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 173 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Chuan-Chiung Chang - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of malaria

Thank you for your contribution to history of malaria. The link you added is identical to reference 80, may be we should avoid overlinking Hempelmann (talk) 13:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I did not realise that. My mistake, sorry. --Gak (talk) 12:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removed link, please continue to improve the article further Hempelmann (talk) 18:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PAS.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PAS.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thioacetazone.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thioacetazone.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A new medical resource

Please note that there is a new freely accessible medical resource, MedMerits (to which I'm a medical advisor) on neurologic disorders. A discussion on ELs to MedMerits and medical ELs in general is currently in progress ("Wikipedia and its relationship to the outside world"). Presto54 (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 17:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Limbic encephalitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PET (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:59, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please use secondary sources per WP:MEDRS. Cheers --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:16, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you not using secondary sources per WP:MEDRS? [2] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:37, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was not aware of this policy.--Gak (talk) 11:50, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. This is still a primary research study [3] and commenting on a retrospective analysis is WP:UNDUE IMO.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:08, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why, when people are going out and buying VitD on the basis of this report?--Gak (talk) 13:20, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your entry in [Management of Depression] regarding Chalder et al (2012) on exercise

Recently, you edited the above mentioned article and added this:

A randomised-controlled trial 361 patients published in 2012 found no benefit from exercise

You cite:

Chalder et al. “Facilitated physical activity as a treatment for depressed adults: randomised controlled trial” British Medical Journal, 2012.

Now I wonder if you've actually read the study. Because, if at all, this study shows that simply encouraging someone to exercise has no effect. Which is equal to encouraging people not to be depressed. The study has been poorly designed, and you might agree on that if you take the time to dive into the matter. A hint: the exercise group were mainly encouraged by phone and had to self-report whatever they did as exercise. "Walking to a car" or "taking the stairs" was included in the definition for exercise. Depressed people have been repeatedly shown to have poor compliance. Would you want to rely on such data to make a claim about physical exercise as a non-treatment for depression? It has been shown to reduce depression in chronically ill people http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2227111

--84.130.180.155 (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages

Dear Author/Gak

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address recently edited an article on Barrett's Osophagus. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please visit my Talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 17:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Medicine

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.

Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit)

Get free access to research!

...Support Open Access...

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 20:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014

The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.[reply]

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors

Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Wikipedia:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Translation Newsletter

Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce

Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 1, June/July 2014
by CFCF, Doc James

sign up for monthly delivery

This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice.

note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject Medicine

Spotlight - Simplified article translation

Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.

Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:

WHO's list of Essential Medicines [4]
Neglected tropical diseases [5]
Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.

We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.

What's happening?

IEG grant

I've (CFCF) taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.

Wikimania 2014

For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.

Integration progress

There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish.
What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.

Swedish
Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that.
Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May.
Dutch
Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie.
Polish
Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article.
(This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration
Arabic
The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.

Integration guides

Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.

Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here [6]

News in short

To come

Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
Proofreading drives

Further reading

Translators Without Borders
Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

Medical Translation

partners

resources

outreach

get involved

Sign up

Thanks for reading! To receive a monthly talk page update about new issues of the Medical Translation Newsletter, please add your name to the subscriber's list. To suggest items for the next issue, please contact the editor, CFCF (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Medicine/Translation Taskforce/Newsletter/Suggestions.
Want to help out manage the newsletter? Get in touch with me CFCF (talk · contribs)
For the newsletter from Wikiproject Medicine, see The Pulse
If you are receiving this newsletter without having signed up, it is because you have signed up as a member of the Translation Taskforce, or Wiki Project Med on meta. 22:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 26 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Burkholderia pseudomallei page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Babesiosis, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. sciencewatcher (talk) 15:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huh7 (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Huh7 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O (talk) 04:41, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Gak, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tseung Kwan O (talk) 04:41, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

Publish an article to the journal.
Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
Join the editorial board.
Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
Technical work like template designing for the journal.
Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 13:56, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Huh7 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Huh7. Thanks! -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 09:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huh7 has been accepted

Huh7, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 12:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gak. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gak. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation in your email

Hi, just a gentle reminder that I have sent a Wikipedia email to you. Regards! Cerevisae (talk) 15:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC) --Can you send it again, please? What is it about? Gak (talk) 01:19, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image Prod

Proposed deletion of File:Planatus x hispanica bark.JPG

The file File:Planatus x hispanica bark.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, poor quality, easily replaceable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jordan 1972 (talk) 19:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Name of precursor to oral penicillin

Please check the identity of the precursor used for making Penicillin V. Is it phenoxyacetic acid, which corresponds to the structure illustrated in penicillin V, or phenoxyethanol as stated in the section Nomenclature. Petergans (talk) 10:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is phenoxyacetic acid; however, phenoxyethanol has also been used as a precursor and that is how it was discovered (it is converted to phenoxyacetic acid in the normal fermentation process)Gak (talk) 20:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, phenoxyethanol was the precursor to phenoxyacetic acid, not to pen. V! Is using phenoxyethanol now an obsolete process? On other matters; It's not easy for me to get to the University library, so I wonder if you can help with these questions.

Is 6-APA made from pen. G? If so, that would explain why pen.G is manufactured on a large scale.
Is 6-APA isolated or is it created and used in situ? The article 6-APA is not very informative.

Petergans (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phenoxyethanol converted to phenoxyacetic acid converted to pen V: Use of phenoxythanol is now obsolete. All the 6-APA now made commercially is derived from pen. G. The full synthetic route for 6-APA has been described, but yields from that route are very low, which means all the 6-APA currently available is ultimately derived from naturally-derived penicillin G. You can bulk-buy 6-APA if you wish: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/a70909 Gak (talk) 16:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RBCG30 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RBCG30 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RBCG30 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kwkintegrator (talk) 01:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 72F fusion protein vaccine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 72F fusion protein vaccine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/72F fusion protein vaccine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kwkintegrator (talk) 01:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]